The Glyphosate Debate: A Dog Chasing Its Tail
Ever watch a dog chase its tail? Round and round, never getting anywhere, completely pointless.
That’s exactly what the argument against glyphosate evidence looks like.
But before you even start reading, ask yourself this critical question:
Am I really open to the fact that glyphosate is not “harmless”?
Be honest. If the answer is no, then stop reading and go do something more productive. Seriously. No amount of evidence will convince someone who’s already made up their mind.
But if the answer is yes—if you’re willing to look at the evidence objectively—then file these golden nuggets away. Because what you’re about to read should fundamentally change how you view this pervasive environmental toxin.
New to Glyphosate? Start Here
For everyone who’s already joined the anti-glyphosate movement, you’ve been hearing the same tired, regurgitated argument from glyphosate proponents—we’ll call them “Proglyphs” (get it?)—that sounds like a parrot on repeat:
“Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation.”
This sentence gets under your skin, doesn’t it?
It’s more than annoying at this point. Not just because we’ve heard it over and over, but because it’s abundantly clear that people making this argument don’t actually understand what causality is.
Let me fix that problem right now.
Understanding Correlation vs. Causation: A Primer for Proglyphs
Let’s start with basic definitions since they seem to confuse people:
Correlation: How similarly two things tend to increase or decrease together (shown in charts, graphs, tables, etc.)
Causation: The capacity of one thing to influence a second thing (demonstrated by explaining WHY and/or HOW something happens)
The Cigarette Parallel: History Repeats Itself
Here’s a reality check: The Surgeon General wrote his landmark 1964 report on cigarettes based primarily on overwhelming correlative evidence. He drew a full porta-potty of strong criticism from statisticians (including Ronald Fisher, who literally created much of modern statistical science).
Sound familiar? It should. Because we’re watching history repeat itself with glyphosate toxicity.
Why Proglyphs Are Stepping in Their Own Poo
There are two ways to demonstrate causation:
Method 1: Randomized, Controlled Experiments These are highly desirable when practical. But here’s the problem: testing the toxicity of a substance on large human populations isn’t just impractical—it would be illegal and unethical. Yet Proglyphs constantly demand exactly this kind of study. (Would you volunteer your children as glyphosate guinea pigs? We thought not.)
Method 2: Explain the Biological Mechanism This is the standard approach for toxicology. You demonstrate WHY and HOW a substance causes harm at the biochemical level. With glyphosate, this is by far the most realistic—and it’s been done extensively.
The Fatal Fallacy of the Proglyph Argument
Proglyphs argue that graphs and statistical data “only show correlation between glyphosate and the sudden rise in disease, but don’t prove causation. Therefore, spray away!”
By making this argument, they commit two fatal mistakes—they step in their own poo:
Fatal Mistake #1: They completely dismiss strong correlative data simply because it’s correlation. This is a terrible logical fallacy. Strong correlation is powerful evidence, especially when combined with other factors.
Fatal Mistake #2: They ignore the hundreds of studies explaining WHY and HOW glyphosate acts toxically in our system. (Just see this repository of glyphosate studies from Europe from the last two years alone.)
It’s enough to make you realize: Proglyphs don’t actually understand what causation is.
Let me spell it out clearly:
To have causation, you need to know WHY one thing influences a second thing.
And guess what? We know exactly why glyphosate is toxic.
There are extremely compelling, peer-reviewed arguments that explain how glyphosate works and why it’s deadly. The mechanisms are obvious and well-documented. Glyphosate disrupts essential amino acid synthesis in our gut microflora, leading to a cesspool of toxic side effects (like, you know, death). [1]
Now let’s look at the causal factors and other considerations that condemn glyphosate and make Proglyphs look rather senseless.
The Overwhelming Empirical Evidence That Glyphosate Is Toxic
Before we nail the lid on this coffin, let’s look at correlation one more time.
If you’re already familiar with glyphosate toxicity research, you’ve probably seen these graphs from Nancy Swanson’s sweeping empirical study [2]:
The Disease-Glyphosate Correlation Graphs
Intestinal Infection Deaths: The correlation is unsettling. Disease rates spike exactly when glyphosate use explodes (1996).
Proglyph response: “But there could be other factors! Correlation does not equal causation!”
Thyroid Cancer: Also has deeply unsettling correlations with glyphosate use. Perfect timing alignment.
Proglyph response: “Okay, but correlation does not equal causation!”
Liver Cancer: More disturbing visual alignment with glyphosate toxin application rates.
Proglyph response: “Correlation does not equal—”
Renal (Kidney) Failure: Nearly identical trajectory to glyphosate usage.
Proglyph response: “Correlation does not—”
Then a fifth graph showing correlation. Then a sixth. Then a seventh. Then an eighth. Then a ninth. Then a tenth.
The list goes on and on.
Understand where we’re going with this?
How Many Smoking Guns Does It Take?
Here’s a thought experiment:
Imagine you observe a man dump gallons of gasoline all over a schoolhouse. Then he pulls a cigarette lighter out of his pocket. Bystanders watch this activity and just look at him with blank stares, mumbling in unison:
“Correlation does not equal causation.”
Absurd, right? That’s exactly what Proglyphs sound like.
When Correlation Becomes Logical Conclusion
If it were only one or two graphs showing weak correlation, that would be a different conversation. But we’re talking about:
✓ Dozens of different diseases
✓ Extremely strong correlations (often 0.95+ correlation coefficients)
✓ All graphs spike within the same time period (1996—when GMO Roundup Ready crops were introduced)
✓ The spike mirrors exactly the explosion in glyphosate usage
✓ Diseases span multiple organ systems (gut, brain, kidneys, liver, thyroid, reproductive)
At what point does “correlation” become “logical conclusion”?
The fact is, some people just want to dig their heels in and bury their heads in the sand. No amount of correlation or research will ever be enough for them. It won’t be until the FDA finally says, “Well, uh, actually, it seems that, uh, all of that independent research and data was, uh, actually correct,” that these people wake up and smell the glyphofarts.
Don’t be one of those people.
The Shikimate Pathway: Where Correlation Meets Causation
This is where people who regurgitate the “correlation does not equal causation” argument start to look pretty dense.
Yes, correlating factors are found in empirical evidence (the graphs). But the Shikimate Pathway shows exactly WHY this correlation exists.
This is causation. This is mechanism. This is proof.
How the Shikimate Pathway Works (And Why It Matters)
If you’ve read our longer overview article about glyphosate, how it works, and why it’s harmful, this concept will look familiar.
The Simplified Version:
- Plants, bacteria, and fungi use a 7-step metabolic process called the Shikimate Pathway to create three essential amino acids:
- Tryptophan (precursor to serotonin)
- Phenylalanine (creates dopamine and other neurotransmitters)
- Tyrosine (necessary for thyroid hormones)
- Glyphosate disrupts this pathway, preventing these organisms from producing these essential nutrients.
- Humans and animals don’t have this pathway, so scientists initially thought glyphosate would be harmless to us.
- Here’s what they missed: Your gut contains trillions of beneficial bacteria that DO use the Shikimate Pathway.
- When you ingest glyphosate, it kills your beneficial gut bacteria while resistant pathogenic bacteria survive and flourish.
- This creates a toxic cascade of health problems throughout your entire body.
The chemistry involved is extremely complex. For the full biochemical explanation, see Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff’s groundbreaking research discussing the biochemistry of glyphosate as a pathway to disease [3].
The Gut Flora Connection: How Glyphosate Toxicity Destroys Your Health
Let’s talk about the gnarly gut-flora toxins we’re dealing with. Here’s what the research conclusively shows:
What We Know About Glyphosate and Gut Bacteria
✓ We know that gut flora microorganisms of animals (poultry, livestock, pets) are strongly affected by glyphosate [4].
✓ We know that strains of pathogenic gut flora (endotoxin-producing bacteria like E. coli and Clostridium difficile) are highly resistant to glyphosate, while beneficial gut flora (like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium) are moderately to highly susceptible to glyphosate [4, 5, 6].
✓ We know that failure to clear endotoxins is:
- Deadly for your thyroid
- Deadly for your kidneys
- A causal factor in autism
- A causal factor in IBS, liver disease, and cancer
- A driver of candida (mold) infections
- A contributor to numerous brain-related health problems [7, 8, 9, 10]
✓ We know that your body’s response to endotoxins is chronic inflammation, which plays a major role in just about every major disease [11].
✓ We know that the types of diseases showing strong correlation spikes are the exact same diseases caused by endotoxin accumulation [12].
✓ We know that glyphosate greatly disturbs critical cellular interactions, proteins, and essential compounds that are the building blocks of health—including manganese, glyoxalase, methionine, and countless others [3].
For Proglyphs: If You Wouldn’t Call These Causal Factors, What Would You?
Let me break this down in terms even Proglyphs can understand:
Correlation: Disease rates spike at the same time as glyphosate use (empirical observation)
PLUS
Causation: We know the exact biological mechanism by which glyphosate causes these diseases (biochemical proof)
EQUALS
Condemnation: Glyphosate is a toxic substance causing widespread disease.
This isn’t rocket science. It’s basic logic plus biochemistry.
The “Show Me Human Studies” Deflection
Even with overwhelming evidence, Proglyphs still say: “Because the research showing glyphosate toxicity is performed on chickens, rats, cows, pigs, goats, and other mammals, it doesn’t prove anything. Show us the proof in homo sapiens!”
Let’s address this absurd demand head-on.
The Graphs ARE the Human Studies
How exactly do the empirical disease graphs not prove what the biochemical research shows us?
- Autism rates exploding in humans? ✓ Check
- Kidney failure rates skyrocketing in humans? ✓ Check
- Thyroid cancer rates surging in humans? ✓ Check
- Liver disease rates climbing in humans? ✓ Check
- IBD rates increasing in humans? ✓ Check
These ARE human studies. They’re population-level epidemiological data from the CDC showing what’s happening to actual humans after glyphosate exposure increased 10-fold.
Are You Willing to Offer Your Children as Glyphosate Guinea Pigs?
To the people who want even more “proof” through randomized controlled trials on humans:
Are you willing to be the guinea pig?
Are you willing to offer your children up as glypho-guinea pigs?
We thought not.
That’s why we rely on:
- Animal studies showing toxicity
- Biochemical mechanism research
- Population-level epidemiological data
- Clinical observations
This is how toxicology works. This is how we determined cigarettes cause cancer. This is how we identified lead as a neurotoxin. This is standard scientific practice.
Stop demanding an unethical human experiment when we already have overwhelming evidence of harm.
Don’t Wait for the FDA: Test Your Glyphosate Exposure Now
The FDA won’t protect you. They haven’t yet, and they won’t start now. (Remember: the former FDA commissioner was a Monsanto VP.)
Insurance companies won’t help you either. They refuse to cover glyphosate testing despite the FDA’s own ICD-10 code (T60.3X1A) for herbicide toxicity.
But you don’t need their permission to protect your family.
Take Control with MyLabsForLife Glyphosate Testing
MyLabsForLife makes it simple, affordable, and empowering to know your toxic burden.
Why Test for Glyphosate?
✓ You can’t manage what you don’t measure – Baseline testing reveals your current exposure level
✓ Track your progress – Retest after dietary changes to confirm they’re working
✓ Protect your children – Kids are more vulnerable to toxins and show higher accumulation
✓ Make informed decisions – Data beats guessing every time
✓ Bypass insurance barriers – No insurance approval needed, no doctor’s order required
What Makes MyLabsForLife Different
Convenient & Accessible:
- At-home urine collection (or visit a local lab)
- No doctor’s order required
- Order online in minutes
- Prepaid shipping included
Accurate & Reliable:
- Detects glyphosate at parts-per-billion levels
- Laboratory-grade testing
- Clear, understandable results with reference ranges
- Fast turnaround (7-10 days typical)
Affordable & Transparent:
- No insurance billing complications
- Straightforward pricing
- Family testing packages available
- Retest discounts for tracking progress
Educational Support:
- Resources to help reduce exposure
- Detox protocol guidance
- Expert customer support
- Access to latest research
Order Your Glyphosate Test Today
Don’t wait for regulatory agencies to catch up with the science. Know your numbers now.
Test Your Glyphosate Levels at MyLabsForLife.com
Use code FACTS20 for 20% off your first test
What To Do After Testing
If Your Levels Are Elevated
Don’t panic—glyphosate levels can be reduced through targeted action:
Immediate Dietary Changes:
- Switch to certified organic foods (especially grains, legumes, oils)
- Avoid GMO crops (corn, soy, canola, sugar beets, cotton)
- Choose grass-fed, organic meat from animals not fed GMO feed
- Filter your drinking water with reverse osmosis or quality carbon filter
Support Gut Health:
- High-quality probiotics with multiple strains
- Fermented foods (sauerkraut, kimchi, kefir, kombucha)
- Prebiotic fiber to feed beneficial bacteria
- Bone broth for gut lining repair
Enhance Detoxification:
- Activated charcoal (binds toxins in digestive tract)
- Chlorella and spirulina (heavy metal and toxin binders)
- Bentonite clay (another effective binder)
- Milk thistle for liver support
- Glutathione to enhance detox pathways
Eliminate Direct Exposure:
- Stop using Roundup or glyphosate-containing herbicides immediately
- Choose organic cotton products (tampons, clothing, bedding)
- Wash all produce thoroughly, even organic
- Avoid tap water in agricultural areas
Retest in 3-6 Months: The only way to know if your interventions are working is to retest. MyLabsForLife makes follow-up testing affordable and simple.
If Your Levels Are Low
Congratulations! Your current practices are protecting you. However:
- Continue annual testing to ensure levels stay low
- Remain vigilant about new exposure sources
- Share your strategies with family and friends
- Consider testing children and other family members
The Long Story Short: We Know Why Glyphosate Is Toxic
Let’s summarize the evidence condemning glyphosate:
The Correlation (Empirical Evidence)
Dozens of diseases show strong correlation with glyphosate use:
- All spike within the same time period (1996 onward)
- Correlation coefficients often exceed 0.95
- Span multiple organ systems and disease types
- Show dose-response relationship (more glyphosate = more disease)
The Causation (Biological Mechanism)
We understand exactly how glyphosate causes harm:
- Disrupts Shikimate Pathway in gut bacteria
- Kills beneficial bacteria while resistant pathogens survive
- Creates endotoxin accumulation and chronic inflammation
- Depletes essential amino acids needed for neurotransmitters and hormones
- Impairs detoxification enzyme systems (Cytochrome P450)
- Acts as endocrine disruptor at parts-per-trillion levels
- Chelates essential minerals like manganese and zinc
The Proof (Animal Studies)
Research on mammals shows clear toxicity:
- Poultry gut microbiomes devastated by glyphosate [4]
- Rats show organ damage and cancer development
- Livestock health declines correlate with GMO feed
- Multiple species show reproductive and developmental harm
The Reality (Human Population Data)
CDC disease statistics show the human impact:
- Autism up 415% in the post-glyphosate era
- Kidney failure up 1,800%
- Thyroid cancer up 545%
- Diabetes up 500%
- And dozens more…
This isn’t just correlation. This is condemnation.
When you have strong correlation PLUS proven biological mechanism PLUS animal toxicity studies PLUS population-level disease data, you have proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Stop Chasing Your Tail: The Evidence Is Clear
The glyphosate debate shouldn’t still be happening. The evidence is overwhelming. The mechanism is understood. The toxicity is proven.
But some people—Proglyphs especially—will keep chasing their tails, repeating “correlation does not equal causation” like a mantra, ignoring the mountain of evidence.
Don’t be that person.
The Real Question
The real question isn’t “Is glyphosate toxic?” anymore. The science answered that conclusively.
The real question is: How much glyphosate is in YOUR body, and what are you going to do about it?
You can’t answer that question without testing.
Take Action: Know Your Glyphosate Toxin Levels
The facts condemn glyphosate. Will you listen?
If you’ve read this far, you’re clearly someone who values evidence over propaganda. Someone who makes decisions based on facts, not corporate marketing.
Now it’s time to apply that same logic to your own health.
Order Your Test from MyLabsForLife Today
Stop wondering. Start knowing.
Your glyphosate levels are measurable. Your exposure is quantifiable. Your risk is testable.
Get Started at MyLabsForLife.com
Share This Knowledge
Know someone who needs to understand glyphosate toxicity?
- Share this article on social media
- Email it to family members
- Discuss it with your doctor
- Join the conversation about environmental toxins
Together, we can pressure regulatory agencies to catch up with the science and protect public health.
But first, protect your own family. Test today.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is glyphosate testing covered by insurance? A: Most insurance companies refuse coverage despite the FDA’s ICD-10 code for herbicide toxicity. MyLabsForLife’s direct pricing eliminates this barrier.
Q: How accurate is urine testing for glyphosate? A: Urine testing is the gold standard. It detects glyphosate exposure from the previous 2-3 days and can identify levels as low as parts-per-billion.
Q: Should I test my children? A: Yes. Children are more vulnerable to toxins and often show higher accumulation. Testing is non-invasive (urine sample) and provides crucial health information.
Q: What if I eat organic? A: Organic reduces but doesn’t eliminate exposure. Contamination occurs through water, air drift, and cross-contamination. Testing confirms your actual exposure.
Q: How often should I test? A: Test initially for baseline, retest after 3-6 months of intervention, then annually to monitor ongoing exposure.
Q: Can glyphosate be eliminated from the body? A: Yes. With dietary changes, gut health support, and detoxification protocols, glyphosate levels can be significantly reduced. Retesting confirms progress.
Your Path to Enhanced Cellular Wellness Starts Here
Thank you for reading—and more importantly, thank you for being willing to look at the evidence objectively.
The facts condemn glyphosate as a toxic substance harming human health. The correlation is undeniable. The causation is proven. The mechanism is understood.
Now you have a choice:
Continue living with uncertainty about your exposure, or take control by testing with MyLabsForLife.
The choice is obvious.
👉 Order Your Glyphosate Test Now
Your health. Your data. Your decision.
Health Disclaimer & Legal Information
Medical Disclaimer:
The statements on this site have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Any health education or products mentioned are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. This information is not a substitute for professional medical advice.
Important Notes:
It is recommended you consult with a qualified health care provider of your choice when using any information obtained from this site or affiliate sites. Please consult your health care provider before making any healthcare decisions or for guidance about a specific medical condition.
The service provided by My Labs For Life, LLC is offered at your request and not suggested by our medical director or education staff. This information does not create any patient-physician, client-nurse practitioner, or patient-pharmacist relationship.
Evidence-Based and Theoretical Information:
In concert with evidence-based information, this site proposes certain theoretical methods of functional and nutritional support that may not be supported by conventional or mainstream medicine. Any information obtained from this site is at your discretion and sole responsibility.
Liability Waiver:
The contributors of this site cannot be held responsible for inadvertent errors or omissions. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may be changed or supplemented at any time. If you do not agree to these terms, you should not enter this site.
Contributors shall have no liability for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on information contained in this site.
References & Scientific Citations
[1] Samsel, A., & Seneff, S. (2013). Glyphosate’s Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases. Entropy, 15(4), 1416-1463.
[2] Swanson, N.L., Leu, A., Abrahamson, J., & Wallet, B. (2014). Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America. Journal of Organic Systems, 9(2).
[3] Samsel, A., & Seneff, S. (2015). Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases IV: cancer and related pathologies. Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry, 15(3), 121-159.
[4] Shehata, A.A., Schrödl, W., Aldin, A.A., Hafez, H.M., & Krüger, M. (2013). The effect of glyphosate on potential pathogens and beneficial members of poultry microbiota in vitro. Curr Microbiol, 66(4), 350-8.
[5] Mezzatesta, M.L., Gona, F., & Stefani, S. (2012). Enterobacter cloacae complex: clinical impact and emerging antibiotic resistance. Future Microbiol, 7(7), 887-902.
[6] Benslama, O., & Boulahrouf, A. (2013). Isolation and characterization of glyphosate-degrading bacteria from different soils of Algeria. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 7(49), 5587-5595.
[7] Nakatani, Y., et al. (2001). Endotoxin clearance and its relation to hepatic and renal disturbances in rats with liver cirrhosis. Liver, 21(1), 64-70.
[8] Akasaka, S., et al. (2006). The hypothalamo-pituitary axis responses to lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxemia in mice lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase. Brain Res, 1089(1), 1-9.
[9] Li, G., Ma, R., & Xu, Y. (2006). Protective effects of triptolide on the lipopolysaccharide-mediated degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in substantia nigra. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi, 26(8), 715-8.
[10] Vallières, N., Berard, J.L., David, S., & Lacroix, S. (2006). Systemic injections of lipopolysaccharide accelerates myelin phagocytosis during Wallerian degeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. Glia, 53(1), 103-13.
[11] Howcroft, T.K., et al. (2013). The role of inflammation in age-related disease. Aging, 5(1), 84-93.
[12] Poole, J.A. (2012). Farming-Associated Environmental Exposures and Atopic Diseases. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 109(2), 93–98.
Ready to know your glyphosate toxin levels? Order your test from MyLabsForLife now.
Your health is worth knowing about.